Death penalty zero tolerance essay

Persuasive Death Penalty Essay Persuasive Death Penalty Essay When turning on the television, radio, or simply opening the local newspaper, one is bombarded with news of arrests, murders, homicides, and other such tragedies.

Death penalty zero tolerance essay

The most heinous of crimes are subject to the highest form of punishment — death penalty. Capital punishment has its share of supporters who believe in the merits of death penalty in fighting crime. On the other side of the coin are those who view the punishment as unconstitutional, barbaric, and just plain cruel.

Many believe that the perpetrators deserve maximum penalty and the highest condemnation of all. This is clearly an emotional response, but it raises the question of whether death penalty is an effective way to deter prospective criminals. This essay aims to show two sides of the issue and argue that death penalty does not necessarily deter criminals from committing future crimes.

The main argument in support of death penalty is its perceived deterrent effect. In his study on deterrence in support of death penalty, van den Haag acknowledges that even though statistical results are inconclusive, capital punishment is likely to deter people from committing crimes because of fear of death, and more so if it is a death ordered by law.

He states that death penalty permanently incapacitates the offender from committing future crimes. He highlights that it is the most feared form of punishment and because of its finality, it could deter prospective murderers who are not deterred by long-term imprisonment.

He also puts more weight on saving the lives of prospective victims rather than preserving the lives of convicted murderers who may re-offend. Based on their two controversial studies, they conclude that for each execution, five murders are prevented. Conversely, one commutation results in five murders.

While statistics appear to strengthen the argument in favor of death penalty, they are just numbers that do not support actual crime rates. However, the strongest arguments are those that criticized the studies for their faulty methodologies, insufficient data and flawed assumptions Liptak, The studies attempt to link executions with murder rate changes over time.

They ask whether executions made a difference in the crime rate at a given period. While this is a valid research question, studies fail to take into account other variables that have direct effect on crime rate such as the effectiveness of the judicial system, demographic changes, and economic conditions.

Critics add that the findings are skewed by data from a few jurisdictions, largely from Texas, hence, it is not representative of national data Liptak, With so few actual executions, the data is thin and conclusions derived from it are considered weak and misleading.

In conclusion, it would be safe to say that there is no clear and indisputable evidence to suggest that the death penalty is an effective means to deter people from committing crimes or murderers from killing again. The ambiguous results of studies make the deterrence argument weak. They are not enough to justify executions.

Ashio-midori.comlogy | Web server is down

It is surprising how politicians continue to support death penalty instead of looking into more effective and reliable alternatives. Capital Punishment and the Supermax Alternative [Online] http: A New Debate [Online] http: The Future of Capital Punishment in the United.

New York University Press.

Death penalty zero tolerance essay

Van den Haag, E. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 60 2. Journal of Applied Economics Persuasive Death Penalty Essay. Persuasive Death Penalty Essay When turning on the television, radio, or simply opening the local newspaper, one is bombarded with news of arrests, murders, homicides, and other such tragedies.

The anti-death penalty argument, ultimately, is founded on flawed assumptions, because it ultimately trivializes human life by not taking a firm stand on it. This is an imperfect world, and there are no perfect solutions to murder, but the least society can do is take a "zero tolerance" position on the taking of human life.

Capital punishment -- the death penalty

Essay about Zero Tolerance Policies in American Schools - In all grades of education, from kindergarten to college, there is a form of discipline known as a zero tolerance policy.

Death Penalty: Zero Tolerance Essay - Just the very mentioning of the “death penalty” can bring out a fury in most people. Those for the death penalty argue that it creates deterrence, punishment, and justice. While those that oppose the death penalty argue about the risk of executing an innocent person or life in prison is a worst punishment.

The Death Penalty Introduction As of , thirty-four States have some form of Death Penalty, while twelve States plus the District of Columbia have no Death Penalty.

The number of Death Penalty executions from by color-coded States follows: (Death Penalty Information Center, ). We eliminated the death penalty for pre-marital sex, adultery, practicing a different religion, engaging in prostitution, homosexual behavior, blasphemy, rebellion by teenagers, etc.

We should eliminate it .

Capital Punishment: The end of the death penalty